
|

Historical Documents
On-Site Inspections Under the Intermediate-range Nuclear Forces Treaty
| Practical and procedural questions
arose during the inspection process, as anticipated by the treaty negotiators.
The treaty established the Special Verification Commission, with a specific
charter to resolve questions relating to compliance with treaty obligations
and to agree on measures for improving the "viability and effectiveness"
of the treaty. This bilateral commission began meeting in Geneva in June
1988; portal monitoring issues arising from both the Magna and Votkinsk
on-site inspections were major topics during its initial 18 months.25
Soviet portal monitoring inspections at Magna began as planned on July
5 and proceeded continuously from that day. Colonel Samarin explained
to a New York Times reporter that the Soviet inspectors worked in 24-hour
shifts at 3-day intervals. They observed or inspected every vehicle
leaving the fenced facility through the portal or through one of the
two plant exits. They carried out random perimeter patrols, usually
walking around the two-mile-long fence encompassing the 185-acre plant.26 Hercules Plant No. 1 was a working
plant, with an average of 400 to 500 vehicles entering and leaving each
week. All exiting vehicles were subject to monitoring. Because the Soviet
Union's portal monitoring equipment would not be in place and operational
for more than a year, initial monitoring was done visually.
Under the treaty, the United States had to declare when a vehicle leaving
the plant was large enough to contain a missile or a missile stage as
large as or larger than the first stage of a Pershing II missile. Those
vehicles had to leave the plant along the specially built portal road
to the Soviet inspection area. Using a measuring tape and a fixed measuring
rod, the Soviet inspectors determined if the missile stage or cargo
being transported exceeded 3.68 meters in length and 1.02 meters in
diameter, which were the dimensions of the Pershing II missile's first
stage.*
In Utah there was genuine community interest in the Soviet INF inspectors.
Requests for speaking engagements, participation in local events, personal
home visits, and media interviews flowed into OSIA's Magna office. The
Soviet team chief was informed of each request; he decided which ones
to accept. For all events, Soviet inspectors were transported and escorted
by OSIA personnel. Private home visits were not allowed. In July and
August, the Soviet team participated in many events, speaking at service
clubs, community groups, and business organizations. Sports events were
especially popular.27
* In the
Memorandum of Agreement of December 21, 1989, this
measurement was changed from 3.68 meters to 3.25 meters. |
| First Treaty
Year at Votkinsk |
| When there are no precedents
in an international treaty, the "first time"
takes on added significance. At Votkinsk, the first
year established patterns for subsequent years. Colonels
Englund and Connell, the alternating U.S. site commanders,
found themselves participating in extensive discussions
with Soviet officials at Votkinsk. Both American officers
were fluent in Russian; both had served as military
attachés at the U.S. embassy in Moscow. Their experience
was put to good stead as Soviet officials frequently
discussed the reciprocal treatment being given to the
Soviet inspectors at Magna. When Englund and Connell
returned to Washington, they often flew to Magna for
a firsthand account of the Soviet inspection and American
escort issues there.
During the first treaty year at Votkinsk, Englund
and Connell focused the American inspectors on two
tasks. First, they established the U.S. standards
and procedures, based on the treaty, for conducting
the inspections. Second, they oversaw the installation
and operation of the monitoring equipment. As noted
above, the INF Treaty gave the inspecting party the
right to make perimeter patrols, install and operate
monitoring equipment, make continuous, direct observation
of the plant's portal and exits, and inspect those
railcars leaving the plant. Colonel Connell explained
to a reporter from the Boston Globe that he was "paid
to be skeptical.... Everything is suspect," he
said. "It's up to the Soviets to prove otherwise."28

During the first treaty year
at Votkinsk, 1988-1989, Soviet engineers began construction
on the American residence, office, and inspection
buildings.
|
| In the first two months, July and August,
the American team consisted of a team chief, deputy,
linguists, treaty specialists, and inspectors. Twenty
U.S. inspection teams had been trained to conduct INF
baseline inspections. One of those teams went to Votkinsk
and assisted with the portal monitoring inspections.
Every 15 days for the first six weeks, another American
inspection team rotated into Votkinsk. In mid-August,
the first cadre from the Hughes Technical Services Company
arrived at the site. Led by Jerry W. Porter, these inspectors
were responsible for providing the technical, operational,
and managerial services for operating and maintaining
the U.S. portal monitoring facility at Votkinsk. Within
a month, there was a full complement of 23 Hughes Company
personnel in Votkinsk. They were a mix of professionals
and specialists: civil engineers, electronic technicians,
Russian linguists, data management specialists, physician
assistants, and chefs. By mid-September, they had completed
their initial on-site training and were functioning
as an integral part of the American inspection team.
Always on site were a cadre of American military personnel:
the OSIA site commander, deputy, and treaty specialists.
They provided leadership and had specific responsibilities
in communicating with Soviet officials. In the fall,
winter, and spring months of 1988-89, the portal monitoring
inspections continued, but another task emerged as
significant. The American inspectors had to install,
with the assistance of Soviet engineers, the treaty-authorized
inspection equipment. Following site preparation by
Soviet engineers, U.S. inspectors installed the following
equipment: traffic lights, power conduits, a closed-circuit
television system, semaphore traffic gates, computers,
and infrared profilers for both road and rail traffic.
Thousands of hours were spent digging conduits, pouring
concrete foundations, laying telephone and power cables,
and installing components of the monitoring equipment.
By June 1989, the American inspectors were using the
equipment.

American Inspector Charles B.
Haver.

Votkinsk, U.S. dormatories under
construction in the spring of 1989.
In a significant accomplishment that first year,
Soviet construction engineers completed all of the
work on the U.S. permanent housing and offices at
Votkinsk. Three large dormitories and an office building
were constructed in the U.S. compound next to the
plant. The three two-story residences had rooms for
each of the INF inspectors, while the office building
contained space for dining, community activities,
offices, and recreation. A warehouse and sauna were
also constructed on the compound. All of the furnishings
and equipment needed for the American inspectors residence
and offices were acquired in the United States, transported
to the Soviet Union, and installed at Votkinsk. In
January 1989, for instance, the U.S. Air Force flew
ten C-141 cargo flights to Izhevsk, the nearest large
city to Votkinsk. It was 38 degrees below zero Fahrenheit,
with three to four feet of snow. Soviet crews helped
the Americans unload the cargo and transport it to
the American compound.29 |
| On June 10, 1989, there
was a celebration at the American compound. The first
year of the INF Treaty was history; Colonel Englund
and the American team held a ceremonial opening of the
U.S. inspectors' residence and office buildings. They
invited Jack F. Matlock, U.S. ambassador to the USSR;
General Major Vladimir I. Medvedev, director of the
USSR Nuclear Risk Reduction Center; and other Soviet
officials and guests to visit the U.S. facilities. It
was a propitious time to review the work of the first
year.30 U.S. portal
monitoring inspections had begun in July 1988; they
had gone on continuously, 24 hours a day, throughout
the year. Contractor personnel had been hired, trained,
and were on site performing their duties. Some of
the treaty-authorized monitoring equipment--traffic
lights, induction loops, closed-circuit television,
semaphore traffic gates--had been shipped to Votkinsk
and was being used. Other more critical equipment--specifically
the large, nondamaging imaging system known commercially
as CargoScan--was not operational by the end of the
first treaty year. The United States had negotiated,
signed, and ratified the INF Treaty with the intention
of using the imaging system to scan railcars leaving
the portal to determine categorically that no banned
SS-20 missiles were exiting the Votkinsk plant. Until
that system was installed, approved, and was in use
at Votkinsk, the U.S. government would not consider
its INF portal monitoring inspection regime fully
operational.

At Votkinsk, the American inspectors
hosted a ceremonial opening of the new residences
and office buildings on June 10, 1989. Colonel Douglas
M. Englund, U.S. Site Commander, welcomed the guests.

Inspector Tim Kubik preparing
food at the celebration.
|
Previous Section | Table of Contents | Next
Section
|

|
|